Add to ORKGOn May 3, 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) announced a final rule redefining two key terms, “fill material” and “discharge of fill material,” in regulations that implement Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This report discusses the revised rule, focusing on how it changes which material and types of activities are regulated under Section 404 and the significance of these issues, especially for the mining industry
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers expressing serious concerns about the need to reduce the potential harm...
In this Note, the author reviews the demise of the Army Corps of Engineers\u27 infamous Tulloch Rule...
In an attempt to provide consistency to the interpretation and application of the statutory phrase “...
On May 3, 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the ...
This report discusses the Clean Water Act that contains two different permitting regimes: (1) Sectio...
The section 404 permitting program has endured a history of divergent interpretations from both the ...
1. The Corps jurisdiction for waters of the U. S. is based on the definitions and limits of jurisdic...
The Clean Water Act’s (CWA) goal of protecting the waters of the United States has been threatened b...
Part I of this article will provide a brief introduction to section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Part...
Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche.Shipping list no.: 2004-0259-P."Printed for t...
This Article, the second in a series of five, examines the meaning of “pollutant” under the Clean Wa...
With the passing of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 a tenuous relationshi...
Mountaintop removal mining operations in the Appalachian region have expanded significantly in recen...
For most of its four-decade history, section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act could have been considere...
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that an applicant for a federal license or permit provid...
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers expressing serious concerns about the need to reduce the potential harm...
In this Note, the author reviews the demise of the Army Corps of Engineers\u27 infamous Tulloch Rule...
In an attempt to provide consistency to the interpretation and application of the statutory phrase “...
On May 3, 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the ...
This report discusses the Clean Water Act that contains two different permitting regimes: (1) Sectio...
The section 404 permitting program has endured a history of divergent interpretations from both the ...
1. The Corps jurisdiction for waters of the U. S. is based on the definitions and limits of jurisdic...
The Clean Water Act’s (CWA) goal of protecting the waters of the United States has been threatened b...
Part I of this article will provide a brief introduction to section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Part...
Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche.Shipping list no.: 2004-0259-P."Printed for t...
This Article, the second in a series of five, examines the meaning of “pollutant” under the Clean Wa...
With the passing of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 a tenuous relationshi...
Mountaintop removal mining operations in the Appalachian region have expanded significantly in recen...
For most of its four-decade history, section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act could have been considere...
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that an applicant for a federal license or permit provid...
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers expressing serious concerns about the need to reduce the potential harm...
In this Note, the author reviews the demise of the Army Corps of Engineers\u27 infamous Tulloch Rule...
In an attempt to provide consistency to the interpretation and application of the statutory phrase “...